What is an explanation? The popular responses are: We can explain what a word means, how to run a computer programme, why John decided to marry Jane, and even historical facts like the extinction of the dinosaurs. But what about explananda such as the linguistic entity “Who saw John?”. The paper surveys a spectrum of responses, some theory-free, others theory-bound. For all of these, we employ the six Dimensions of explanation
The goal of this paper is to show how scientific explanation functions in the context of idealized m...
It is not a particularly hard thing to want or seek explanations. In fact, explanations seem to be a...
I evaluate three schools in linguistics (structuralism; generative linguistics; usage based linguist...
We have come a long way, and perhaps I lost some of you at some points in my argument, and failed to...
I will assume that the study of language essentially falls under what Chomsky (1986) has called “Pla...
In this paper, I outline a heuristic for thinking about the relation between explanation and underst...
Abstract. My main claim is that explanations are fundamentally about relations between concepts and ...
Scientific explanations must bear the proper relationship to the world: they must depict what, out i...
Jörg Cassens, Rebekah Wegener, Lorenz Habenicht, and Julian Blohm discuss the dialogic form of expla...
Philosophers of science are interested in characterizing the nature of scientific explanation. Much ...
Theories of explanation seek to tell us what distinctively explanatory information is. The most ambi...
As discussed by Newmeyer (1998), the debate between “formal” and “functional” approaches to explanat...
Philosophical accounts of scientific explanation are broadly divided into ontic and epistemic views....
In Chapter 6 of Biological Foundations of Language, Lenneberg argues against continuity theories of ...
The goal of this paper is to show how scientific explanation functions in the context of idealized m...
It is not a particularly hard thing to want or seek explanations. In fact, explanations seem to be a...
I evaluate three schools in linguistics (structuralism; generative linguistics; usage based linguist...
We have come a long way, and perhaps I lost some of you at some points in my argument, and failed to...
I will assume that the study of language essentially falls under what Chomsky (1986) has called “Pla...
In this paper, I outline a heuristic for thinking about the relation between explanation and underst...
Abstract. My main claim is that explanations are fundamentally about relations between concepts and ...
Scientific explanations must bear the proper relationship to the world: they must depict what, out i...
Jörg Cassens, Rebekah Wegener, Lorenz Habenicht, and Julian Blohm discuss the dialogic form of expla...
Philosophers of science are interested in characterizing the nature of scientific explanation. Much ...
Theories of explanation seek to tell us what distinctively explanatory information is. The most ambi...
As discussed by Newmeyer (1998), the debate between “formal” and “functional” approaches to explanat...
Philosophical accounts of scientific explanation are broadly divided into ontic and epistemic views....
In Chapter 6 of Biological Foundations of Language, Lenneberg argues against continuity theories of ...
The goal of this paper is to show how scientific explanation functions in the context of idealized m...
It is not a particularly hard thing to want or seek explanations. In fact, explanations seem to be a...
I evaluate three schools in linguistics (structuralism; generative linguistics; usage based linguist...